On April 17, the U.S. Senate voted to
block any vote on a gun control regulation supported by 90% of the
people. The Senate would have passed the bill had a vote been taken,
since they had 54 votes to allow debate to continue. Opponents of the
bill included lobbyists for gun manufacturers and the radical fringe
that opposes any attempt to limit the quantity or quality of
armaments that any American can buy.
The Constitution is to blame for this.
The Framers planned for the Senate to be the last bastion for
minorities against the majority of public opinion. Once again, the
Senate has fulfilled its role. The Senate also proved that this
country is not democratic, since the vast majority of the people
support gun control but can't even get the Congress to vote on a bill
that grants their wishes.
Gun control is not the only issue that
can't be discussed in the Senate. Global warming, affirmed by over
90% of the world's climate scientists, also fails to get a hearing
due to spending by its wealthy opponents. Too many rich people depend
on oil for the majority to have their way. Yet global warming
threatens to destroy the wealth of the whole world. The slogan of the
oil companies seems to be, “I'll Be Gone, You'll Be Gone.” By
which they mean to say that when the economy collapses under the
weight of natural disasters, they will have made their fortunes and
gone away to a haven for the wealthy.
There are only two solutions to this
problem. One relies on less democracy, the other on more.
The first option was chosen by the
Romans in the First Century A.U.C. The Roman world was racked by
revolutions. The ruling class, holders of political power, were
unable to stem the violence. But the violence continued until finally
a leader, Julius Caesar, emerged who destroyed the power of the elite
and declared himself sole ruler of Rome. The people acquiesced to his
rule because they were exhausted by warfare and uncertainty.
Democracy came to an end and with it the possibility of long-term
survival, since an absolute ruler is only concerned about his own
power, not the welfare of the people.
There is a possibility that such a
person may emerge in the United States. There is nothing in our
Constitution to prevent such an action if the situation is desperate
enough. In the past, American presidents have increased their power
with the consent of the Congress. John Kennedy brought the nation to
the brink of nuclear war because he believed missile sites in Cuba
threatened the U.S. mainland, but never explained how the Cubans
could be a threat when the Russian military possessed missiles that
could reach the mainland from Russia. Lyndon Johnson persuaded the
Senate that the navy of North Vietnam represented a danger to the
United States that justified years of war and thousands of American
deaths. Ronald Reagan convinced the Congress that Marines should
invade the island of Grenada because a few American medical students
might possibly be in danger. George Bush convinced the whole country
that Saddam Hussein posed a threat to the U.S. that justified 10
years of war and a trillion dollars of military spending. Americans
have a history of letting presidents do anything they want.
There is another way, though, one that
results in more democracy, not less. The country could pass the
National Initiative Amendment, which would create a way for the
majority to exert its will. The initiative process has already been
tried in 28 states. Recently California has ended the deadlock in its
legislature, very similar to the deadlock in the U.S. Congress, with
an initiative.
A national initiative has the advantage
over the current Congress that individual Representatives would not
need to vote on an issue. They could pass an initiative and let the
people decide. If such a process were available today, the gun
manufacturers could not spend enough money on propaganda to sway 90
per cent of the electorate to their position. Reasonable gun laws
could be passed nationally.
The deaths of thousands of innocent
men, women, and children through gun violence is an important
stimulus to legislative action. The wealth of our country's wealth
and power by global warming is even more critical, since it affects
every American, and every person in the world. A national initiative
would permit the people to vote on whether to permit oil companies to
pollute the world. A national initiative could overrule a Supreme
Court stuffed with oil company backers, because the Court cannot rule
that an amendment is unconstitutional. The amendment passed by the
Constitution would become part of the constitution.
No comments:
Post a Comment