It's hard to tell how many people on
the web are writing comments arguing against any kind of gun control. There may be hundreds, or maybe only one. Many of these posts use the same arguments. It's suspicious that so
many of them have good grammar and spelling, because many commenters
have neither. They appear to be copying talking points, just as
climate change deniers parrot the same points, then move on when the
latest on is debunked. How many fraudulent claims need to be debunked
before people stop believing the next one?
In the same way, gun violence deniers
hit the same points over and over again:
Stage 1. Gun violence is not a problem.
This point works much of the time, but the deniers have a hard time
defending it when 23 children are killed in a school, or 12 office
workers and police are killed on a US navy base. Then, the deniers
move on to stage 2 of their denialism.
Stage 2. OK, Gun violence is a problem,
but there's a very simple solution: Everyone should carry a gun
wherever they go, to church, to work, to school. This excuse works
because many people are looking for revenge after the latest binge of
senseless murders. But this excuse fails when a man armed with a
shotgun breaks into a naval base and kills 12 people before he
himself is killed by police. Surely the answer is not so simple.
Stage 3. Gun violence is a problem, but
there is no solution so we'll just have to live with it. This opinion
is currently being heavily defended by the NRA. One of their favorite
tactics is to flood the internet with pro-gun violence posts. This
approach, a form of trolling, reminds me of a denial of service
attack, where hackers send thousands of fake messages to a website,
forcing the website to shut down. Only people who have no real
confidence in their message and are at the same time utterly
unscrupulous, would use this tactic, but that's the NRA in a
nutshell. But the argument that there is no solution is easily
disproved because there are numerous countries where gun control
measures have been adopted and the murder rate has declined. For
example, the murder rate in the US is 27 times higher than that of
Australia.
Stage 4. Gun violence is a problem.
Solutions that have worked in other countries will not work in the
US, either because the US is unique (exceptional) in the world.
Australia, for example is said to have suffered urban violence in
recent years. Statistics do not show any increase in the murder rate
due to urban violence in Australia. Stories told of other countries
with low murder rates turn out to be exaggerated or made up entirely.
Stage 5. Gun violence is a problem, but
we can do nothing to stop it because the US constitution guarantees
Americans the right to keep and bear arms. The Constitution, however,
does not guarantee the right of Americans to kill each other with
guns. In District of Columbia v. Heller, (554 U.S. 570 (2008), the
Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an
individual's right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful
purposes, but that
nothing
in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding
prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally
ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places
such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions
and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.1
Since
Heller, the NRA has persisted in passing ever more lenient gun
violence laws. Each new law increases the likelihood for sudden death
at the hands of enraged gunmen. The NRA has taken its anti-democratic
tactics to new levels with contributions from obscenely rich men. Our
only hope of sane gun violence policy in this country is that the
Supreme Court decided Heller by only one vote. A future, less
ideologically hidebound court, will certainly reverse that course.
NB: As I have indicated, the NRA has tried to stifle opposition to its views. If you agree with the opinions expressed in this post, please circulate it to your friends and, by so doing, help end the NRA's reign of terror over the corrupt and cowardly politicians who currently inhabit the Capitol and our statehouses.
1.
DC
v. Heller,
Opinion
of the Court,
p. 54.
No comments:
Post a Comment