Barack Obama swept into the Presidency
with the promise of hope and change.
Change was certainly long overdue.
George Bush and his supporters preached intolerance of anyone whose
views were out of step with their own. Corporate America moved
millions of jobs overseas. Bush sent a man who despised international
law to the United Nations as his ambassador. Bush started two new
wars to satisfy the militarists and the war profiteers. Bush
deregulated the financial industry and precipitated the worst
financial crisis since the Great Depression.
Sometimes, however, a flame burns
brightest just before it burns out. Perhaps the suffering of our fellow
Americans under the corporate boot is about to end.
The American cultural revolution
occurred in the 1960s and 1970s. Large numbers of people began to
question the received culture of the 1950s. They questioned the U.S.
military role in the world. They questioned whether the heterosexual
marriage should be the only accepted form of intimacy. They
questioned whether marijuana, a relatively harmless drug, should be
outlawed while more harmful drugs, such as alcohol, were tolerated by
society. They questioned why radio stations played Sinatra and Peggy
Lee instead of Chuck Berry and Little Richard. Worst of all, from the
standpoint of traditional society, they questioned why anyone should
go hungry in a country where farmers were paid not to grow
food.
The counterculture, as it came to be
called, took hold of the imagination of the young. People stopped
looking to New York fashion designers for clothes and instead
decorated their own clothes with beads and brightly colored thread.
The counterculture had its own heroes, like Elvis and John Lennon,
Dylan and Joan Baez, Allen Ginsberg and Jack Kerouac. Those of us who
welcomed the counterculture believed that the country had turned the
corner. We believed the elite would stop discriminating against African Americans and women, since discrimination was now against
the law, or at least against the Constitution.
The counterculture forced the U.S. to
end the Vietnam War. Under their influence, the government passed Civil Rights and Voting Rights. The counterculture believed that the establishment would just step aside and let the
rest of us start living a better life based in liberty, equality, and
brotherhood.
Then something completely predictable
happened. Traditional society fought back. Ronald Reagan, who had
been a pitch man for General Electric in the 1950s, led them. George
Wallace stood in the schoolhouse door at the University of Alabama to
stop integration in 1963. Reagan called out the national guard to
stop protesters in Berkeley in 1969. George Wallace was stopped by
President Kennedy, who took over command of the National Guard, and
integration proceeded peacefully, for the moment. Reagan called out
the Sheriff's deputies of Alameda County and told them to use
whatever means necessary to stop a peaceful protest of college
students and Berkeley residents. This time President Richard Nixon
failed to take over the National Guard and violence ensued.
Reagan became extremely popular with
those who hated college students, integrationists, and peace lovers.
He was elected President in 1980 and started up the American war
machine again. He appointed Supreme Court Judges who believed that
African Americans were a privileged special interest group that
needed to be suppressed. The world grew bloodier as the U.S. ignored
U.N. agreements and sent troops to Grenada, aided insurgents in
Afghanistan and Honduras, and bombed Libya.
Reagan became the first president since
World War II to start a war to raise his political popularity.
Republican President G. W. Bush used the same tactic. Such wars
violate customary international law.
Compounding the social and foreign policy problems with G. W. Bush's term, the economy collapsed in 2007.
Progressives were disappointed with Obama's performance during his first term, although they had to admit his failures were not entirely his own fault. Now, however, a new wind is blowing through Washington and the rest of the country. Obama has contributed by ordering his ICE agents to stop deporting “dreamers”, immigrants whose parents brought them here illegally.
Obama apparently is no longer concerned about what Republicans think of his policies, though he could have gone further and extended the same privileges to all immigrants. He could also transfer some of the funds for “securing our borders” to other areas, like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and the Consumer Protection Agency. But any sign of movement is better than none.
Attorney General Stephen Holder has
also been a disappointment to progressives, primarily for failing to
prosecute Wall Street for abuses that sent the economy into a tail
spin. But Holder, too, showed signs of progressivism when he ordered
federal officers not to list the amounts of drugs on indictments
against drug offenders. These amounts trigger automatic sentencing
guidelines that have turned the American prison system into a Gulag
of Soviet proportions. Holder has always known that drug laws are
aimed squarely at African American young men, because those are the
people who get sent to prison.
Holder's action, if continued by his
successors, could end the War on Drugs altogether. For decades, a
prison industry has grown up relying on the War on Drugs to fill its
cells. Prison Guards have joined together in powerful unions with but
one goal, to keep the prisons full and preserve their well-paying
jobs. Police departments have spent time and money chasing drug
offenders because they could seize the assets of drug offenders. The
departments have grown wealthy, with ever fancier helicopters and
planes and drug detecting equipment. The people who profit from
prisons and drug busts spend millions influencing elections.
This one action of Holder's may break
the cycle of corruption. Without prisoners, there will be no need for
prisons. Prison Guards will have to find other work. Policemen can go
back investigating political corruption and corporate crime. The War
on Drugs will end.
Finally, from New York comes the
astonishing tale of a judge who said "no!". Judge Schira Scheindlin
ruled that NYC's stop-and-frisk rules are unconstitutional because
they use racial profiling to target African Americans and Latinos.
NYC Mayor Bloomberg howled out loud about this ruling, claiming the
Judge “knows nothing” about law enforcement. Scheindlin issued a 192-page opinion in Floyd
v. City of New York that proves she knows a great deal about
racial profiling and police harassment.
Scheindlin's conclusions come as no
surprise to the black and brown residents of NYC, who have complained
loudly about being stopped for no reason. This constant harassment
made some of them afraid to leave their houses to go to the store or
to work. The fear they felt is the fear inspired by a police state,
where justice has become comatose by command of the government. This
is the same fear that Trayvon Martin felt when he was chased by a
neighborhood watchman who assumed, mistakenly and with bloody
consequences, that Martin was up to no good. What is amazing to
the black and brown residents subjected to Bloomberg's reign of
terror is that an honest federal judge agrees with them.
So here they are, three straws in the
wind. These actions are not subject to review by our completely
broken Congress, nor can these three courageous people, Obama,
Holder, and Scheindlin, be subjected to ridicule by a barrage of defamatory campaign ads, because none of them needs to run for office.
What remains to be seen is whether these straws can predict which way
the wind blows. We should all hope that they do.
No comments:
Post a Comment